Defence and autotoxicity: Researchers elucidate the biosynthesis and mode of action of diterpene glycosides in wild tobacco
Plants produce toxic substances to defend themselves against herbivores. In a new study, scientists from the Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology in Jena and the University of Münster, Germany, were able to describe in detail the biosynthesis and exact mode of action of an important group of defensive substances, the diterpene glycosides, in wild tobacco plants. Diterpene glycosides allow plants to fend off herbivores. The study shows that these plant chemicals attack certain parts of the cell membrane. To protect themselves from their own toxins and to prevent their cell membranes from being damaged, tobacco plants store these substances in a non-toxic form which is synthesised in a very particular way. Autotoxicity and the protection against it seem to play a greater role in the evolution of plant defences than previously thought (Science, doi 10.1126/science.abe4713:, January 2021).
Many plants produce chemical defences to protect themselves against being eaten. Still little is known about what makes these substances toxic to their consumers. Researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology and the University of Münster have now investigated how plants produce toxins and store them in their tissues without harming themselves. In particular, they wanted to know whether the mechanisms of autotoxicity and its prevention share similar mechanisms as the toxic characteristics that provide defence against herbivores.
Autotoxicity and defence
For their experiments, they chose diterpene glycosides from Nicotiana attenuata plants, a wild tobacco species. “These substances occur at very high concentrations in the leaves of tobacco plants. But we had no idea why they were such effective defences or why they could be so toxic to produce. So the situation was completely different from the other very abundant toxin that this plant produces, namely, nicotine. Nicotine is a specific neurotoxin. Since plants lack nerves and muscles, they offer no target for the toxin. So producing and storing nicotine does not harm plants,” says Ian Baldwin from the Department of Molecular Ecology at the Jena Max Planck Institute, where the study was carried out.
To their surprise, the researchers found that tobacco plants which had been transformed so they could no longer produced two proteins involved in the biosynthesis of the diterpene glycosides and thus also not form the defensive substances otherwise stored in the leaves in large amounts, showed conspicuous symptoms of self-poisoning: they were sick, unable to grow normally, and could no longer reproduce. Further experiments revealed that certain components of the cell membrane, so-called sphingolipids, had been attacked.
Targeting the cell membrane
Sphingolipids are substances found in all animals and plants, including the enemies of wild tobacco, the larvae of the tobacco hawkmoth Manduca sexta. The researchers therefore asked whether the sphingolipid metabolism could be the target of the diterpene glycosides. In fact, Manduca sexta caterpillars, which had fed on plants without diterpene glycosides, grew significantly better than larvae, which had fed on controls that contained the defensive chemicals. Analyses of the frass of Manduca sexta larvae, which had ingested diterpene glycosides with their food, provided further insights, as the degradation of the plant toxins during larval digestion is more or less in reverse order to the synthesis of the substances in the plant. Plants prevent self-harm by storing the defensive substances in a non-toxic form. However, when insects feed on the plant, a part of the non-toxic molecule is cleaved off and the chemical becomes activated or “armed”. “Interestingly, in both cases, in plants with incomplete diterpene glycoside biosynthesis and in feeding caterpillars, the target of the toxins is the sphingolipid metabolism,” says first author Jiancai Li.
Sphingolipids are mediators in many physiological processes. This makes the effect of diterpene glycosides on sphingolipid metabolism so intriguing. “Diterpene glycosides and their derivatives can have broad defensive functions against many agricultural pests and pathogenic fungi. At the same time, many human diseases, such as diabetes, cancers and some neurodegenerative diseases are also associated with elevated sphingolipid metabolisms,” says Shuqing Xu from the Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity at the University of Münster, who is one of the senior authors of the study. Physicians have been searching for effective substances to treat these diseases by inhibiting the sphingolipid metabolism. The diterpene glycosides studied here could be potential candidates for further investigations.
“Frassomics“ – a new powerful tool to study interactions between organisms
The analysis of larval frass proved to be the key to success in this study. The scientists call this new approach “frassomics”: a combination of frass (larval droppings) and metabolomics – the analysis of all metabolites in an organism. “From this work, we realised that frassomics can be a very powerful research tool. The analysis of larval frass can provide metabolic clues about how what one organism produces is metabolised by consumer organisms,” says Ian Baldwin.
The scientists plan to gain more insights into the “digestive duets” that occur between plants and insects, in order to better understand ecological interactions between plants, insects and microorganisms.
Reference: Li, J., Halitschke, R., Li, D., Paetz, C., Su, H., Heiling, S., Xu, S., Baldwin, I. T. (2021). Controlled hydroxylations of diterpenoids allow for plant chemical defense without autotoxicity, Science, DOI: 10.1126/science.abe4713. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe4713
Header image: The larva of a tobacco hawkmoth Manduca sexta on a wild tobacco leaf: A detailed chemical analysis of larval frass (small black ball) revealed how toxins are activated in the caterpillars, thus providing clues to the biosynthesis of the toxins in the plant, the reversed process in comparison to digestion, or as the scientists called it: the “digestive duet”. Credit: Anna Schroll.
Source: Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology.